Keep up to date with the franchise industry and news.
Business Franchise magazine is the essential read for anyone looking to run their own business with the support of an established brand. From household names to emerging franchise businesses, you’ll find a wide range of investment opportunities within its pages, alongside in-depth market reports, real-life case studies, industry news and expert advice to help you make informed decisions about your future in franchising.
As the official magazine of The Franchise Exhibitions, it also incorporates the Show Guide for the only events organised with the full support of the British Franchise Association. Events take place in Birmingham, London, Manchester, Scotland, Online and more! Subscribe today to receive FREE tickets.
Legal expert Manzoor Ishani asks whether franchise deposits are ethical
Some franchisors ask for
In these circumstances, if no deal was done, each party walked away and there were no recriminations. This idyllic period came to an end in the 1970s and, as franchising grew, competition increased. By the mid-90s, prospective franchisees had a choice for the first time.
During this period, franchisors found it easier to recruit and there were more prospective franchisees in the market than ever before. The led to
For the first time, franchisors
There is nothing illegal about franchisors taking deposits. Whether or not it is ethical depends on the circumstances under which the deposit is taken and whether or not it is refundable, in whole or in part.
I see nothing unethical if the deposit is fully refundable. However, problems can arise when the terms for the refund are not clearly stated. The taking of a deposit, which is not refundable under any circumstances, should be regarded as unethical unless the franchisor can justify it. Most deposits, however, tend to be partially refundable, with the franchisor reserving the right to retain a small proportion. If franchisors wish to take deposits, the following basic rules ought to be observed:
1. The franchisor should be able to justify the deposit.
2. If the prospective franchisee does buy a franchise, he ought to be given credit for the deposit towards the payment of the initial franchise fee.
3. Except in the most exceptional circumstances, a deposit should be either fully or partially refundable. Where it is partially refundable the franchisor should be entitled to retain only that part of the deposit which constitutes a genuine cost to the franchisor of his dealings with the prospective franchisee.
4. There should be a definite period within which a decision has to be made as to what is to happen to the deposit.
5. If a refund is necessary, it should be refunded without delay.
6. It should be clear at the outset who is to get the interest earned on the deposit.
7. The amount of the deposit must be reasonable bearing in mind the initial franchise fee and the investment the prospective franchisee will be required to make if he purchases the franchise.
In the present economy, some franchisors are now relenting on this issue and are willing to give prospective franchisees the benefit of
Prospective franchisees who have been reluctant to pay deposits to franchisors have, on occasions, suggested that such sums should be paid to the franchisor’s solicitors who are required to hold the money as stakeholders. This can work well, but much depends on the nature of the franchise and how much is involved.
Ultimately, it boils down to a matter of trust between the franchisor and franchisee, the reputation of the franchisor and the ability of the franchisee to look after himself.
Manzoor Ishani is a Senior Consultant Solicitor with